Difference between revisions of "Talk:Critical Scientists"
From TobaccoControl Tactics
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:When it comes to scientists, I don't think that Free-Choice Scientists (or pro-choice scientists) is the right title for this page. I believe that these scientists (at least those I am more aware of) are denouncing some (or all) of the lies and manipulations of the tobacco control industry without necessarily being all ''free-choice''. I believe that a title more along these lines would be more appropriate. How about ''Scientists challenging the anti-tobacco tactics'' ? | :When it comes to scientists, I don't think that Free-Choice Scientists (or pro-choice scientists) is the right title for this page. I believe that these scientists (at least those I am more aware of) are denouncing some (or all) of the lies and manipulations of the tobacco control industry without necessarily being all ''free-choice''. I believe that a title more along these lines would be more appropriate. How about ''Scientists challenging the anti-tobacco tactics'' ? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | It is correct that these scientists are not necessarily "free choice"; their critique and denunciation of the lies and manipulations used by the tobacco control advocates has is likely to have it's roots in what used to be of great worth: '''scientific integrity'''. Perhaps this: "scientists questioning anti-tobacco tactics and methods" may more to the point. | ||
Revision as of 18:13, 12 June 2012
Title choice
- When it comes to scientists, I don't think that Free-Choice Scientists (or pro-choice scientists) is the right title for this page. I believe that these scientists (at least those I am more aware of) are denouncing some (or all) of the lies and manipulations of the tobacco control industry without necessarily being all free-choice. I believe that a title more along these lines would be more appropriate. How about Scientists challenging the anti-tobacco tactics ?
It is correct that these scientists are not necessarily "free choice"; their critique and denunciation of the lies and manipulations used by the tobacco control advocates has is likely to have it's roots in what used to be of great worth: scientific integrity. Perhaps this: "scientists questioning anti-tobacco tactics and methods" may more to the point.
